ep-logo1.GIF (3325 bytes)

Home Organization Workshops Projects Publications News Useful Links

line-5y.gif (117 bytes)

EUROPROBE News 9

The two figures of this paper are not included in this version since they contain too much detail for a *.gif file of reasonable size.
To see them, refer to the
News9.pdf  file

Timing and tectonic setting of Neogene magmatism in the Pannonian Basin
and Carpathian Arc

Downes, H. (Dept of Geology, Birkbeck College, Malet St., London, UK)
Pecskay, Z. (Institute of Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Ben tér 18/C, Debrecen, Hungary).

Introduction

Neogene magmatism in the PANCARDI region can be broadly classified into two types (Szabó et al, 1992): (a) an earlier phase of volcanism of calc-alkaline affinity, identical in its petrography and geochemistry to subduction-related magmatic rocks from all over the world; (b) a generally later phase of alkaline volcanism, which is extremely similar to the late Tertiary/Quaternary intraplate activity found elsewhere in Europe (Wilson and Downes, 1990). In this report, we will discuss the timing of this magmatism and attempt to relate it to different stages in the tectonic evolution of the PANCARDI region. For a more detailed review of all aspects of PANCARDI magmatism, a Special Issue of the journal of the Italian Volcanological Association "Acta Vulcanologica" (volume 7) has recently been published on this topic.

Areal distribution of PANCARDI magmatism

Fig. 1 shows the areal distribution of the volcanics as compiled by Pecskay et al. (1995). A large volume of the earliest volcanics is buried in the Pannonian and Transylvanian Basins, although some outcrops also occur around the edges of the basins. Much of this material is highly siliceous acidic pyroclastic tuffs and ignimbrites, which may have travelled far from their source areas, and in general the precise source areas of these deposits is unknown.

The main outcropping calc-alkaline volcanoes are dominantly intermediate (andesitic) in composition and form a generally arcuate chain in the Western Carpathians, trending W-E from central Slovakia and northern Hungary into eastern Slovakia (localities 11-21 on Fig. 1). In the Ukrainian Carpathians, the trend of the chain becomes NW-SE and in the Eastern Carpathians of Romania, NNW-SSE (localities 26-30). An exception to this geographic trend is the calc-alkaline volcanism of the Apuseni Mts. situated between the Transylvanian and Pannonian Basins. The alkaline magmatism is equally widespread, occurring sporadically across the whole of the region from the Graz Basin to the Persanyi Mts. of the Transylvanian Basin.

The main regions of alkaline activity are on the northern margin of Lake Balaton (locality 2) and in the region of southern Slovakia/northern Hungary near Nograd-Novohrad (locality 13). However, alkaline volcanics are absent in eastern Slovakia, Ukraine and most of the Eastern Carpathians of Romania. Alkaline magmatism consists mostly of small basaltic cinder-cones and lava flows. Many of these primitive basalts carry mantle-derived xenoliths (Downes et al., 1992; Vaselli et al., 1995) which give us an insight into the composition of the lithospheric mantle beneath the region.

Timing and tectonic setting of magmatism

Detailed and accurate geochronology is crucial to enable us to understand the relationship between magmatism and tectonic events. A first-order observation is that the alkaline magmatism post-dates the calc-alkaline eruptions throughout the area. Only at the very southern part of the Eastern Carpathians are the two types of magmatism contemporaneous. This clearly indicates a strong relationship between magmatism and tectonic activity, i.e. calc-alkaline magmatism is related to collisional events, whereas the alkaline type relates to extensional events.

Previous work had indicated that the age of the calc-alkaline volcanism became progressively younger from west to east around the Inner Carpathian arc. Recently, Pecskay et al. (1995) compiled and reviewed all of the available geochronological data, based largely on K-Ar age determinations (Fig. 2). Their remarkable conclusion was that much of the age-trend was not valid and, instead, acid magmatism began in several regions 19 Ma ago, followed by the formation of andesitic stratovolcanoes along the Western Carapthian arc at ca. 16 Ma. The majority of these calc-alkaline volcanoes were extinct by 10 Ma, an age which coincides with a major E-W compressional event in the region, which Decker and Peresson (1995) suggest was related to the entry of continental crust into the subduction zone (i.e. cessation of subduction of oceanic crust). Only in the Eastern Carpathians (from the Gutii volcanic area to the south Harghita volcanoes) do we see a significant age-progression along the chain from 10 Ma in the north to 0.2 Ma at the southern end of the chain. The age-progression along the Calimani-Gurghiu- Harghita segment of the East Carpathian chain is very striking.

The tectonic significance of this result is that, if subduction is responsible for the calc-alkaline magmatism, then the subducted slab first reached the required depth for magma generation of 100-120 km (the "magma generation window") simultaneously beneath the whole of the Western Carpathians between 19 and 16 Ma ago, and ceased to generate calc-alkaline magma after only 6-9 Ma had passed. In contrast, the slab which subducted beneath the Eastern Carpathians must have reached the magma generation window at a progressively later and later time.

Another striking feature revealed by Fig. 2 is that the oldest extension-related alkaline magmas (black shading on Fig. 2) are about 9-11 Ma old and were erupted just as the calc-alkaline magmatism was waning. From this we can conclude that we have a "switch" from a tectonic regime dominated by collision to one dominated by extension at this time. After this, alkali basalts occurred sporadically both in time and place, until the eruption of the youngest flow (Nova Banya in central Slovakia) which overlies a post-glacial river terrace. These magmas may be related to a widespread upwelling of the asthenospheric mantle beneath Europe (Hoernle et al., 1995). If this is the case, then they could not be erupted from the upwelling asthenosphere until after the subducting slab had become detached and had sunk into the asthenosphere. Such "slab window" alkali basalts have been observed in other regions of the world when a subducting slab has been detached.

Current debates and unanswered questions

The general features outlined above are largely accepted by the volcanological and petrological community working in the region. However, some disagreements still exist. For example, Ukrainian and Romanian colleagues have pointed out that tectonic events such as nappe emplacement and thrust faulting had ceased in the Eastern Carpathians long before the onset of magmatism. Thus, they argue, the calc-alkaline magmatism of the Eastern Carpathians cannot easily be related to subduction. Our response is that it will take a finite time for a subducted slab of oceanic crust to reach the temperature and depth of the magma-generation window; this could account for the gap between the cessation of tectonism and the onset of magmatism. The time interval between the beginning of subduction and the arrival of the subducting slab in the magma generation window will be a function of the angle of subduction and the rate of subduction. In fact, if subduction is very shallow, as occurs in some parts of the Andes, magma generation may not occur at all. In the Eastern Carpathians we see a remarkably narrow volcanic zone and fast progressive movement of volcanism, indicating that the period of time which the slab spent in the magma generation window was short. This in turn suggests that the piece of oceanic crust which was subducted was of small dimensions. Slab detachment in the Eastern Carpathians may have followed the arrival of unsubductible continental crust of the Tornquist zone or East-European Platform at the trench around 10 Ma ago (Decker and Peresson, 1995).

Another unsolved problem is the origin of the widespread acidic magmatism which is the earliest magmatic feature of the region. Although most workers suggest that the source volcanoes were situated to the N and NE of these basins, in the Western Carpathian arc, the precise relationship between the stratovolcanoes and the pyroclastic deposits is unknown, particuarly as the pyroclastics appear to pre-date most of the stratovolcanoes. It has also been suggested by Slovak colleagues that many of the widespread intermediate and acidic volcanics of the Western Carpathians are not directly related to subduction, but may be more closely linked with some other major tectonic process such as lithosphere delamination, in which hot asthenosphere is brought into direct contact with the base of the crust, heating it and causing melting. Such hypotheses can be tested using isotopic and other geochemical methods on the earliest products of the acidic magmatism.

Conclusions

In the past few years, before and since EUROPROBE became interested in the PANCARDI region, researchers from all of the PANCARDI countries have been engaged in joint collaboration both among themselves and with colleagues from the UK, Italy and the USA. Numerous projects on individual volcanic regions have been undertaken and many publications have resulted. Now, however, we are at a point where we have a large amount of geochronological, geochemical and volcanological data which must be synthesised into a tectonomagmatic framework. We should be asking ourselves "what is the tectonic significance of our results?" and "how do our results fit into the larger-scale picture of tectonomagmatic processes in the PANCARDI region?" Only in this way will we be able to move forward to achieve a greater understanding of the relationship between magmatism and tectonics in this region.

Acknowledgements

Much of this work was sponsored by OTKA grant T7278 and the University of London Central Research Fund.

References

  • Decker, K. and Peresson, H., 1995. Late Miocene E-W compression in the Alpine-Carpathian-Pannonian region linked to late subduction in the Eastern Carpathians. Terra Abstracts, 7, 271.

  • Downes, H., Embey-Isztin, A. and Thirlwall, M.F., 1992. Petrology and geochemistry of spinel peridotite xenoliths from the western Pannonian Basin (Hungary): evidence for an association between enrichment and texture in the upper mantle. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 109, 340-354.

  • Hoernle, K., Zhang, Y.-S. and Graham, D., 1995. Seismic and geochemical evidence for large-scale mantle upwelling beneath the eastern Atlantic and western and central Europe. Nature, 374, 34-39.

  • Pecskay, Z. et al., 1995. Space and time distribution of Neogene- Quaternary volcanism in the Carpatho-Pannonian Region. Acta Vulcanologica, Special Issue 7, 15-28.

  • Szabó, Cs., Harangi, Sz. and Csontos, L., 1992. Review of Neogene and Quaternary volcanism of the Carpathian-Pannonian Region. Tectonophysics, 208, 243-256.

  • Vaselli et al., 1995. Ultramafic xenoliths from Plio-Pleistocene alkali basalts from the Eastern Transylvanian Basin: depleted mantle enriched by vein metasomatism. J. Petrol., 38, 23-54.

  • Wilson, M. and Downes, H., 1990. Tertiary-Quaternary Extension-Related Alkaline Magmatism in Western and Central Europe. J. Petrol., 32, 811-849.

 

Line2grey.gif (403 bytes)
arriba.gif (832 bytes) Back to EUROPROBE home page

Last updated: December 29, 1999

Your comments are welcome! © Irina Artemieva, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
The site is based on the earlier developments of © Hermann Zeyen, Université de Paris-Sud, France

Some icons and ideas have been taken from: El Pais Digital, Spektrum der Wissenschaft (Scientific American), 
CORDIS (Community R&D Information Service of the European Community), GFZ Potsdam